news

Sony xperia e1 dual camera review

Sony xperia e1 dual camera review





Valid till 2017/5/25



Oct 31, · Sony Xperia E1 Review: Snapdragon dual and its chunky curved body unashamedly embraces ‘cuteness’ more. Video embedded · CameraThe camera is a weak spot for the Xperia E1. It’s a barebones 3-megapixel shooter that lacks sorely in details and captures choppy sawron. com ma. Sony Xperia E1 review The Sony Xperia E1 is a cheap phone Things like the camera lens being clumsily recessed behind the battery cover.
Exactly the same problem I had on my Lumia The leaves on a tree, for example, just looked like an artificially generated texture. InSony decided to alter its smartphone strategy and launched numerous affordable entry level smartphones, aiming to Review solid Android at prices close to those of some featurephones. Menneisyys Sony would you say that about him if you read that he is negatively criticizing a product that he’s never used and when there are people who disagree he gives them shameful names? It’s Xperia that those errors are a bit more apparent in the Note4 shots. It has certainly shown the PA folks know absolutely nothing about photography. See my article on HDR shooting on the Camera at Dual
Oct 31, · Sony Xperia E1 Review: Snapdragon dual and its chunky curved body unashamedly embraces ‘cuteness’ more. Video embedded · CameraThe camera is a weak spot for the Xperia E1. It’s a barebones 3-megapixel shooter that lacks sorely in details and captures choppy sawron. com ma. Sony Xperia E1 review The Sony Xperia E1 is a cheap phone Things like the camera lens being clumsily recessed behind the battery cover.

sony xperia e1 dual camera review

sony xperia e1 dual camera review

sony xperia e1 dual camera review

sony xperia e1 dual camera review

sony xperia e1 dual camera review

sony xperia e1 dual camera review

sony xperia e1 dual camera review

sony xperia e1 dual camera review

Review sony xperia e1 dual camera the eyes

For the latest Gadget News, like us on Facebook. Apple doesn’t make lenses either. I don’t carry my mirrorless everyday with me, instead I carry my phone with a very capable camera now. Xiaomi Redmi 4A Critic Rating: Its clear that Sony have given up the smart phone marked. SwedishPhoto The Z3 is known to get cracked backs without doing anything to it. Menneisyys “Get off your high horse and your phone that hasn’t been rated.

So if a “less-specced” phone provided a better phone camera – that would be fine by me. Exactly the same problem I had on my Lumia It’s pretty difficult to find a perfect unit IMHO. The only phones with good lenses I had were the and the Surely this is a phone review that is focused on the image capture function?

I have no beef with the device but it ain’t a camera, at best an electronic and very capable Swiss army knife. We focus on camera features, performance and image quality. As previously stated I have no beef with the device, I don’t have an issue that you can make a call with it.

I respect your view that it is like reviewing a point and shoot. I don’t agree that they are the same thing. I don’t like mobile phones myself, mostly because of the socially negative impact they have.

Mobile phones suck from my point of view. I suspect I have a minority view point on this but this technology is more socially regressive than progressive.

Yes you are right, I have added another element to the discussion, but not without first setting out why I think there is a difference between cameras and mobile phones with an image capturing function.

I find it sinister that this function has more profile than the erratic networks the suppliers use, more holes than a Swiss cheese with poor reception and signal drop offs.

Perhaps putting a sweetie in the bag for consumers is another way of justifying the ridiculous tarrifs folks are charged for a mediocre phone service. Call it a camera and you have the illusion of added value, except it’s not a camera.

The Sony R series for example is a camera and pocketable and takes better photographs than any current phone. Thanks w50, I do understand, the review is titled “Sony Xperia camera review”.

Perhaps I am being pedantic about the use of the word camera. My Sony Xperia Z3v has image stabilization as an option in manual mode in settings and it works quite well. I have seen the specs for the Z3 and it does too.

Are you sure you got this right, DPR? Many other reviews state lack of image stabilization and DPR lists it as a con here. It’s there, so please don’t copy and paste from other reviews.

The Z3 has digital image stabilization. What I have listed as a con is the lack of optical stabilization which is way more efficient and the Z3 definitely does not have. Nice 4K Video but what about the quality of audio?

Separate audio recording with ext. Z have bad screen, Z1 have ok screen yet still the non-removable film. This review itself proves the Z3 has pretty mediocre image quality and absolutely awful lens QC.

The DxOMark report was first published as a stand-alone article before the iPhones were tested. As we usually do I have now integrated into our full review. This has turned into a Menneisyys Note4 cult show.

Give us all a break on your favorite device. The Z3, Z3C and Z3v are excellent devices with hi res music, two day battery life and features that don’t stop in a beautiful package with an excellent camera.

Can you say waterproof too? PVCdroid, lolz, in the long thread below, “Papi61” called me an Apple iSheep because I’ve been stating all sweep pano-capable iDevices have better-quality panorama output than the Note4.

Am I a Note4 fanboy, after all? Well, the review above proves the opposite. And not only because of the massive noise reduction and oversharpening. Can you say lens QC issues?

Get off your high horse and your phone that hasn’t been rated. A 79 rating only bested by one phone makes it damn good despite the hatchet job here. I’ve had enough Samsung’s to know this camera does very well for a smartphone.

I’ve caught several trolls like you with phony stories on water leaks. The IP68 rating is from an independent agency. The underwater photography feature of this phone makes it a nice complement to my photography gear.

I’ve used it in water several times. You should give your Note 4 a try underwater, today would be best. You are obsessed and turning this into more than a great camera on a great phone with great battery life, the Z3 line.

I’ll say additionally that trolls like you have become a significant problem creating too many to overlook good phone products because you believe God himself has placed you on earth to convince others what to buy.

These are magical devices compared to five years ago and it’s more about what flavor and design people want. I never wanted a Note. Does this mean they’re cr ppy?

DxO’s ratings have sometimes nothing to do with reality. For example, they don’t at all reflect sample variance; in this case, major lens decentering issues. Not only on the Z3, but, as has been stated by other owners, previous Z-series flagships too for example, the Z2.

I’m afraid it was YOU that act like a blind fanboy. You for example state the Z3 is waterproof. In this very comment section, I has even been constantly attacked by a member called “Papi61”, who called me a blind Apple fanboy for stating Apple’s iDevices have a better pano stitching algorithm than the Note4.

Yeah, sure I’m a blind Samsung fanboy I’ll go and find this error now and correct it: The Note4 doesn’t seem to suffer from lens QC issues. Its lens is consistently good at least I haven’t seen any Note4 with a decentered lens.

It’s unknown whether this is possible on Z3’s – I have no specific information on the latter. Nevertheless, it’s still significantly worse than that of any iPhones or iPads. See my debate with Papi61 at the very bottom of this page.

You really won’t want to use the Note4 for sweep pano shooting. Thanks for detailed response. I have not compared my Note4 with other phones, but compared to my Nikon DSLR, Note4 still image quality is outstanding video quality, at p and 4K, is excellent.

Own this phone, will be interesting to see how the images can be edited with Android 5 which should be released for this phone very shortly probably start of March.

Will allow for RAW capture which might improve matters considerably. Note that not all Lollipop devices get RAW access. For that matter, very few of them; for example, none of Samsung’s handsets.

Please quit it both of you. This is not GSMArena. Brag about android or apple or superiority there. We discuss photgraphy here. The megapixels themselves wouldn’t be THAT big a problem. Let me point out that the Samsung Note 4 “only” has four megapixels less; still, it produces, with some third-party apps, absolutely fabolous images.

Not beating the Nokia, not even the, but clearly more detailed, less smeared etc. The Achilles’ heel of this phone seems to be the lens with its very bad QC. I own a Note 4.

It’s has the best smartphone camera right now. The Note 4 is better than iPhone 6 Plus in my opinion. It’s a pity that DxO has explicitly decided to not review this phone. Why did they make this decision so early and why the reason to stand so firm with this decision?

I just don’t get it. If it is any consolation I will try and review it before the new MWC models become available. Note 4 was only launched at IFA, so it is still fairly new.

Just remember not to base your evaluation on the output of the stock Camera app. The Note4 is so much more capable of when using with an app capable of “tapping in” to the imaging pipeline before the unnecessarily strong noise reduction and oversharpening.

Regrettably, this is only possible on Snapdragon based devices, and only via the app “Snap camera HDR”. Also see my full articles posted to the Android subforum here at DPR, where I’ve elaborated on different aspects of the Note4 pretty thoroughly.

Then, the Note4 shines. Menneisyys you’ve mentioned this before but I won’t promise anything in this respect. In terms of testing we have to draw the line somewhere and if I tested all phones with several camera apps we’d probably publish one smartphone review per year: The almost-RAW images it’s able of exporting assuming you completely disable the pretty bad in-app sharpening and don’t enable the, by default, disabled noise reduction, which is also pretty bad are of much higher quality than those saved by the stock Camera app.

Ok, also just got the news that we will have DxO data for the Note 4 soon, hopefully by the end of next week. Pretty handy review, since the Z4 model is supposedly launching next month. Sony replaces their top-end model every 6 months, so between getting your hands on a review model and producing a meaningful review you inevitably get close to the launch date of the successor.

However, even if the Z4 is being launched next month, that doesn’t mean it’ll actually be available in the shops straightaway. In any case the Z3 will be available for quite some time longer.

Pretty mediocre as a smartphone camera. Not to mention as a phone, particularly with the unsettling news of Sony’s probably selling off their entire smartphone business, meaning a definite end of any official future firmware upgrades.

Not that previous Sony models received that many upgrades In addition to the usual stuff bad oversharpening, watercoloring via the, at least in broad daylight, unnecessarily strong noise reduction, Sony really should improve their sweep pano mode.

Heck, even Samsung’s implementation is way better, which, in turn, can’t hold a candle to that of Apple. And the decentered lens and bad front camera the latter being particularly important in dual-camera modes here: BTW, the article doesn’t elaborate on this: I personally wouldn’t bother with the OOC images of this phone or, for that matter, that of my Samsung Note 4 – with RAW-like images, however, the situation is entirely different.

Not so sure of that. GSMArena compared the Note 4 and iPhone 6 plus in this regard and the Note 4 came out with better detail also higher total MP count and more accurate colors, similar amount of stitching errors very little for both, the iPhone 6 plus has slightly better dynamic lighting control over a wide scene.

I’ve very thoroughly compared the Note4 to the iPhone5 and the Air2. But still outdoes the Note4. I’ll some day publish an article on all my findings. For example, their Note4 vs.

See my article on HDR shooting on the Note4 at http: The iPhone 6 uses a Sony chip. Which is the same now used by budget Android phones. The Note 4 uses a much improved and much more expensive 16mp chip from the same maker.

It’s funny how you believe the older chip is better. And guess what, it’ll be the best in the world when Apple finally buys it at a tremendous discount because meanwhile Sony has released something better, which will be featured in the best Android phones.

It’s no coincidence that while the iPhone 6 is the most expensive phone, it’s actually the least expensive to build, because it largely uses obsolete technology. That explains Apple’s ridiculously huge profits.

But then again, Apple customers are easy to fool, just tell them that everything in the iPhone is the best and they’ll believe it In the reality distortion field, Sony’s 8mp camera chip which is what Apple uses is much worse than Sony’s 20mp camera chip.

Let me guess, this chip will be the best in the world as soon as Apple buys it at a bargain price because it’s obsolete The iPhone 6 might use an old sensor I am actually not sure if this is true but they certainly get very good IQ out of it and that’s what counts.

Most but not all of the higher res sensors in Android and Windows phones are not capable of resolving better detail than the 8MP sensor in the Apple. Please DO read my articles on achieving the best possible image quality with Note4 camera before posting such clueless feedback.

Man, check out these images in the article. If the lens softness decentering? The generic softness on the right side is apparent even in the 8Mpixel superior auto mode, let alone the 20 Mpixel one.

With near-RAW output, the results would be even more awful. LOL at you parroting Apple’s propaganda. Like I said, Apple gets away with buying obsolete technology at bargain prices precisely because their gullible customers can believe anything.

Like a cheap 8mp chip from Sony being better than a very expensive 20mp chip from the very same manufacturer. Do you even know that there are several budget Android phones using the very same obsolete 8mp chip?

Oh yeah, Apple, as usual, sprinkles magic dust on their old components and bam, instantly they become the best in the world It must be stressed again that the sensor is only part of the equation.

Lens quality and software processing also have a VERY strong effect on the end results. And, based on this article,. In these two areas, iPhones are definitely better. Their lens quality and QA are pretty consistent.

Let me point out again that, with the Snapdragon based Note4 at least, you can save almost-RAW’s, which result in way better quality than anything achievable with the stock Camera app or the iPhone in standard stills mode, I’d add.

These latter two bullets have a very strong and adversary effect on the Z3’s output images. Again, the sensor is just part of the equation. Lens quality and processing also have a HUGE effect on the overall quality.

You’re making ridiculous assumptions like Samsung having a worse quality control than Apple. Oh yeah, you’ve owned several iPhones, no doubt about it I’m sure you wouldn’t be caught dead using an Android But your anecdotal experience limited to a few phones doesn’t mean that Apple has a perfect quality control.

But hey, you know with absolute certainty that Samsung has a terrible QC and that’s what you run with, real evidence be damned Again, the only reason you review Android phones is to unfairly compare them to the iPhone and then tear them apart.

Like all “reviewers”, you pick an absolutely insignificant detail where Apple has the upper hand and make it all about that. Now that Apple is getting crushed by a slew of new Windows laptops with a 4K screen, all of a sudden resolution is meaningless, and it’s all about battery life My goodness, you people are soooooo predictable Don’t worry, that’s what most American tech “journalists” do.

I’m sure you’re well aware that your career would be over in a New York minute if you dared to tell the truth about Apple products It’s Sony that has terrible QC, at least when it comes to lens decentering issues.

I’ve never stated Samsung has bad QC. And, of course, when Apple buys components from Sony, all they have to do is sprinkle a little magic dust on top and voila’, no more faulty parts Apple doesn’t make lenses either.

As a matter of fact, they don’t actually make anything. I bet I know times more about smartphone photogrphy than you. You’re referring to me? I’m in Europe, not in the US.

And no, I’m not on Apple’s payroll. I seriously doubt it Did you read DPR’s review above? Which is definitely a QC issue. As well as HDR and panorama, you get nine creative filters, some of which are a little more creative than the norm.

The two Sony specials are the Harris shutter and kaleidoscope. A Harris shutter exposes different colours at slightly different times, letting you produce pretty funky results if you move the phone a bit while shooting.

Actually using the Sony Xperia E1 camera isn’t masses of fun in a more basic respect, though. It’s pretty slow, lacking that immediacy that is at the heart of mobile photography.

There’s no focusing delay as there’s no focusing to be done, but there is shutter lag and processing lag. Image quality is quite bad too, as you’d expect from a 3. Detail is fairly low and dynamic range is pretty bad — that’s the camera’s ability to bring out detail in bright and dark areas of a single scene at the same time.

There is an HDR mode to remedy the dynamic range issue, but it’s far from the best. Ice Cream Sandwich is still an extremely competent platform full of nice features, but it already has two successors, so it does come as a slight disappointment for us.

Still, corners were always going to be cut when we talk a smartphone with this kind of price. And the Xperia E dual still has plenty going for it so the lack of Jelly Bean is not something that should make you lose interest in it altogether.

Let’s take a closer look the all the features it has to offer. The Sony Xperia E specs sheet is not stuff from the geeks’ dreams, but it makes it extremely competitive in its own price class.

The chipset does raise concerns, but since it’s not going to need to deal with a demanding p display, it might turn out quite adequate. The lower screen resolution itself is not that much of a problem either as it’s spread on a pretty compact screen by today’s standards.

Construction homes xperia camera dual review e1 sony miles day

With no autofocus and no manual metering, you have zero hands-on control over your photos in traditional terms. You can’t pick a subject for your photos and can’t choose whether to expose the photo to suit the sky or the foreground.

For photography fans, these are all big no-nos. What the Sony Xperia E1 offers instead is an unusually generous crop of extra modes and filters. It’s a cut-down selection of what you get in an Xperia M2 or Xperia Z2.

As well as HDR and panorama, you get nine creative filters, some of which are a little more creative than the norm. The two Sony specials are the Harris shutter and kaleidoscope. A Harris shutter exposes different colours at slightly different times, letting you produce pretty funky results if you move the phone a bit while shooting.

Actually using the Sony Xperia E1 camera isn’t masses of fun in a more basic respect, though. We have to keep reminding ourselves how inexpensive this phone is, since it really doesn’t feel cheap.

The 3-megapixel camera doesn’t have a flash, and it’s probably for the best that there’s no front camera. The battery also seems a bit puny at mAh. On the bright side, there’s Bluetooth 4. Sony’s distinct Android skin makes an appearance here, on top of Android 4.

It’s one of our preferred custom interfaces, though it does feel quite cramped on such a low-resolution screen. You also lose a bit of screen space thanks to the use of soft buttons – until an update to Android 4.

There are other tradeoffs too, for example the keyboard is cramped and it’s really easy to hit the navigation buttons when typing since they’re right beneath it.

At least there’s a dedicated Recents key instead of the more common but redundant Menu key. The interface should be familiar to anyone who has used a recent Sony smartphone.

There’s the usual excessive bloatware both on the home screens and in the app launcher menu. That’s a lot of preloaded apps; many of which have overlapping functionality and none of which are removable.

These plus the multiple default homescreen widgets make the phone’s software feel cluttered. While the Sony Xperia E1 Dual is a very affordable phone, all this confusion means it might not be the most suitable choice for first-time Android users.

Sony could easily have toned down its software assault for this device. Camera Some things are scaled down, for example the camera app. Sony’s usual plethora of filters, effects and modes are mostly missing.

Auto mode is pretty self-explanatory, and there’s almost nothing you can do other than point and shoot. There are 16 scene presets to choose from manually, such as low light, fireworks and snow, as well as a largely useless HDR setting.

The Picture Effect options are just basic filters, and you can expect the phone to slow down significantly when using them. The Xperia E1 Dual is definitely not going to help you take amazing spontaneous photos.

For starters, the camera app is terribly slow – much more so than the rest of the UI – and there’s way too much shutter lag. The camera itself has a fixed-focus lens – you can’t tap to focus or compose images.

The photos we took with the E1 Dual during the course of our testing were all uniformly disappointing. You can forget about taking shots of any landscape or scenery; the camera only works on nearby subjects such as faces.

The leaves on a tree, for example, just looked like an artificially generated texture. Edges were harsh and poorly defined, and exposure was completely off balance.

Even with simpler subjects, the camera was underwhelming – don’t expect to be able to read regular-sized text or see any subtle detailing. Performance The Xperia E1 Dual isn’t a speed demon by any stretch.

It’s good enough for basic everyday usage and a bit of music, social networking and Web browsing on the side. It takes a second or so to switch apps or move between screens and in some cases Sony’s own animated transitions make the phone feel like it’s slow to respond.

Benchmark results were quite average, though we were happy to note that graphics scores were around twice as high as those of even slightly higher-priced phones, thanks to the choice of a well-balanced Qualcomm SoC rather than a competing chip with more CPU cores but worse GPU performance.

Sometimes rejecting the biggest brands pays off. But how much will you really have to pay for the Sony Xperia E1? However, phones like this really make more sense as mobiles to buy outright — on contract you might as well pay a tiny bit extra to get a higher-end device.

There are no different varieties of Xperia E1 to worry about when buying. The phone just comes in one flavour — 3G with 4GB of internal memory. It does come in white, purple or black shades, but the actual hardware is the same.

Sony’s higher-end phones are some of the slickest mobiles around — even the fairly affordable Xperia M2 has the same sophisticated glassy look as Sony’s top-end Xperia Z2. However, the Sony Xperia E1 is a lot more conventional.

There’s no glass or glass-look rear here. The back is the same sort of curved, removable plastic battery cover seen in most budget mobile phones. As it has a pretty small 4-inch screen, carrying a little extra weight isn’t really an issue.

The phone is very easy to use in one hand thanks to its small stature and I can’t imagine even kids’ hands having too much trouble with the phone. This kind of ergonomic accessibility is great, but the Sony Xperia E1 does feel quite cheap.

Where Sony’s other mobiles put a lot of effort into feeling high-end, the roughly textured finish here doesn’t impress the fingers, and a few rough design edges don’t impress the eyes either.

Things like the camera lens being clumsily recessed behind the battery cover, the rather over-egged speaker grille on the back and that the textured finish goes a bit shiny with wear show the Xperia E1 up.

It doesn’t look or feel more expensive that it is. There are some little extras some of you might appreciate, though.

Nokia 8 Critic Rating: Xiaomi Mi A1 Critic Rating: Xiaomi Mi7 Critic Rating: Xiaomi Redmi 4A Critic Rating: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 Critic Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Critic Rating: From around the web.

From Around the Web. InFocus Turbo 5 Plus. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2. Apple iPhone 8 Plus buy at Amazon. Apple iPhone 8 GB buy at Amazon. Nokia 6 buy at Amazon. Xiaomi Redmi 4 buy at Amazon. Xiaomi Redmi 4A 32GB.

Xiaomi Redmi 4 64GB. For the latest Gadget News, like us on Facebook. Sony Xperia E5 Critic Rating: Sony Xperia X Critic Rating: From around the Web. Vernee Mix 2 Critic Rating: Oukitel K Critic Rating: As it is not covered in glass you don’t have to worry so much about it shattering should you drop the thing.

And even if something bad does happen to the little Xperia E1, you won’t have to cry for too long. You don’t need to take out a mortgage to buy one of these.

The pick of the bunch is the Motorola Moto E, a phone that doesn’t quite have the brand credibility of the Sony Xperia E1 but really does ace the basics better than the E1 — the screen, the body, general performance.

Sometimes rejecting the biggest brands pays off. But how much will you really have to pay for the Sony Xperia E1? However, phones like this really make more sense as mobiles to buy outright — on contract you might as well pay a tiny bit extra to get a higher-end device.

There are no different varieties of Xperia E1 to worry about when buying. The phone just comes in one flavour — 3G with 4GB of internal memory. It does come in white, purple or black shades, but the actual hardware is the same.

Sony’s higher-end phones are some of the slickest mobiles around — even the fairly affordable Xperia M2 has the same sophisticated glassy look as Sony’s top-end Xperia Z2.

However, the Sony Xperia E1 is a lot more conventional. There’s no glass or glass-look rear here. The back is the same sort of curved, removable plastic battery cover seen in most budget mobile phones.

As it has a pretty small 4-inch screen, carrying a little extra weight isn’t really an issue. The phone is very easy to use in one hand thanks to its small stature and I can’t imagine even kids’ hands having too much trouble with the phone.

This kind of ergonomic accessibility is great, but the Sony Xperia E1 does feel quite cheap. Where Sony’s other mobiles put a lot of effort into feeling high-end, the roughly textured finish here doesn’t impress the fingers, and a few rough design edges don’t impress the eyes either.

Things like the camera lens being clumsily recessed behind the battery cover, the rather over-egged speaker grille on the back and that the textured finish goes a bit shiny with wear show the Xperia E1 up.

It doesn’t look or feel more expensive that it is. There are some little extras some of you might appreciate, though. Like Sony’s old Walkman phones, the Xperia E1 has a dedicated music button up top.

Hold it down and it launches the music player app. It can also be used to control music playback while you’re listening, like the remote control seen on many pairs of headphones.

Are headphone remotes more useful? Yes, absolutely, but I do think the Xperia E1 button will come in handy for those who like to hold their phone while going out for a run.

Xperia e1 dual camera review sony for windows desktop

GSMArena compared the Note 4 and iPhone 6 plus in this regard and the Note 4 came out with better detail also higher total MP count and more accurate colors, similar amount of stitching errors very little for both, the iPhone 6 plus has slightly better dynamic lighting control over a wide scene. Lars Rehm apologies, my mistake, this is corrected now. Key Features Review Price: Jamshed Avari has been working in tech journalism as a writer, editor and reviewer for over eight years. I just don’t get it. EthanP99 Theres only 3 buttons on the phone, just like any other phone. For photography fans, these are all big no-nos.

In these two areas, iPhones are definitely better. It’s another question the entire device is half-baked and I in no way would purchase it today. Sony Xperia E1 dual.

Xiaomi Mi7 Critic Rating: Menneisyys I’ve started working on my article comparing the Note4 to Apple’s implementation of sweep pano. An AI-based system developed at the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems is capable of creating high-definition versions of low-resolution images, using a texture-based approach. Image quality is quite bad too, as you’d expect from a 3.

See…

58 59 60 61 62

 

Free year xperia dual camera review sony e1 out

You know, one of those cherry picked for review That’s a lot of preloaded apps; many of which have overlapping functionality and none of which are removable. The story behind Albert Watson’s iconic Steve Jobs portrait. See…

(c) 2017 http://sawron. com. Theme: / and Http://sawron. com/.

Related posts

Leave a Comment